Bob:

Well... I think I know what you mean. The solution would be an android man that has what I'll call "pandora.com" personality. It would basically change every few days to something new, but still something that's likely to be interesting.

And, I want the "pandora.com" woman android. I want her to look different every few days also. That would be interesting.

Suzy:
> I mean like qualities you want in someone or the personality
> compatibility. Also, for me. I get bored easily.
>
>

Bob:
> which desires?
>
> are we talking specifically about you getting swept off your feet?
> that particular thing is going to be difficult because you already
> know the game that a guy would theoretically use to sweep you.
>
> if we are talking about guys - different story - considering they
> don't need to get swept off their feet to be fulfilled.
>


Suzy:
>
> even if you could pick up anyone, not anyone with fulfill desires.
>
>

Bob:
>
>
> how do you mean?
>

Suzy:
>
> what about the pickiness factor?
>
>

Bob:
>
>
> remember when i said girls are distracting to the
> point of
> messing
> up other stuff and you sort of disagreed... or at
> least started
> giving some kind of counter-examples.
>
> this is the thing. i think i have perspective now.
> if you have
> options, the one girl is not that distracting. she
> is never an
> emergency. she can always be replaced*. in fact, she
> knows
> this, and
> will not mess with you as much. but if you don't have
> options, the
> thought of her can really be destructive - maybe
> upsetting
> from fear
> of loss - maybe upsetting because she's not even right -
> she's just
> there.
>
> the game is not to get a girl. it's to alter the
> probability of
> getting all girls. specifically, alter your neural
> network
> in such a
> way that many girls are ok with you. this is what people
> call pick
> up or whatever - learning the game. it's really just
> being
> social.
> you already are a pickup artist (right down to the
> details, like
> talking to the guy who runs the snack stand), i find it
> interesting.
> if you were a man, you'd be set.
>

>
>
> *sort of - you know as well as i limits on what
> can/cannot be
> replaced so i won't think about that carefully here
>
>
>
>
>
>